Confusion Is Next Part 4
July 11th, 2013 by
Confusion Is Next: A 4-part Look at Music SEO In A New Era Of The Music Industry
Part 4 – Same As It Ever Was?
The important distinction to make is for microdata’s use in the presentation of music is in regard to the desired function of the information being processed. When listing a business address or embedding a video testimonial or compiling reviews for a company’s online ranking, the most important content that needs to be targeted for extraction from the formatting is basic information about the business, its location and its purported quality according to consumers. The goal is to get a search engine to pull a relatively simple assessment of an item or page of content that points as directly as possible to the business or source website. As we discussed in Part 2, this is not necessarily the focus for musical work.
As you can see, between the schema properties available for the CreativeWork classification and the MusicRecording classification, there is a great deal of information that can be provided to a search engine for any function. Obviously, the data provided through schema should include standard title, album and technical information. What I think could be of increasingly great importance to aspiring new artists, however, are the more relative and subjective microformatting properties available within the CreativeWork schema. A handy way to think about this is as a contemporary substitute for the “Recommended If You Like…” stickers that came on CD’s for radio and promotional performances back when CD’s were still actually real things people used.
“Genre” is obviously a key component that should probably be used with as much specificity as possible without descending into comically pompous territory. “Pop” is probably not specific enough to help anyone, but some exceedingly overwrought and ultimately marginalizing mega-description like “Neo Nerdcore Post-Synth-Wave” wouldn’t really tell anyone anything either (unless that’s an actual thing, in which case, sorry. I’m getting old).
More intriguing, though, are CreativeWork schema parameters like “audience,” “discussionURL,” “isBasedOnURL,” “reviews” or “typicalAgeRange.” These all seem to provide great opportunities to associate a band or musician’s work with something a listener might actively search for, either on a standard search engine or on an internet radio provider. Again, I can provide no certain evidence that any of this will lead to any direct boost in profile on any music-centric site at this moment. I can say, however, that using schema is a really simple and effective way for descriptive information about a work or its creator(s) to be transmitted and received. Simple and effective is generally considered good for business, so it shouldn’t seem outlandish for schema or some similar style of microdata-driven assessment of material to be used in the development of new music dispersal services.
Click here for Part 3
[…] What really intrigues me about all of this, though, is the idea of using SEO techniques to somehow link a band’s online “associations” in such a way that it might be reflected by Daisy or Spotify playlists. No matter how many hordes of ex-college radio DJs Trent Reznor and Dr. Dre are going to hire to add the supposed human element to Daisy, there is still going to be a lot left up to automated algorithms. What this means is…oh, hello there, schema, I didn’t even see you standing over there. Perhaps we should sit down and chat a minute in Part 4. […]